<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salesforce.com&#8217;s New Group Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salesforcecontent.com/salesforcecoms-new-group-edition/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salesforcecontent.com/salesforcecoms-new-group-edition</link>
	<description>Latest News and Insider Information From an ex-Salesforce.com Employee</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Salesforce Review</title>
		<link>http://www.salesforcecontent.com/salesforcecoms-new-group-edition#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Salesforce Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salesforcecontent.com/salesforcecoms-new-group-edition#comment-6</guid>
		<description>It's rather common practice for enterprise software companies to change the naming of their products.
Think about SAP for example (SAP R/3 --&#62; SAP ERP 2005 --&#62; SAP ERP 6.0).
I agree it's not very transparent and customers go nuts about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s rather common practice for enterprise software companies to change the naming of their products.<br />
Think about SAP for example (SAP R/3 &#8211;&gt; SAP ERP 2005 &#8211;&gt; SAP ERP 6.0).<br />
I agree it&#8217;s not very transparent and customers go nuts about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
